Life is basically kinetic

Posted on by

Life is energy, is motion and is also in-formation. Life is mind and soul and always in motion. The motion is expressed by thought in the mental sphere. All this occurs both in and outside of spacetime. Everything is in motion whether in the physical world or in the mental world.

Theta in Scientology is defined as life energy, thought, spirit, soul even divine energy and it is also surprisingly defined as ‘static’. The latter was perhaps Hubbard’s biggest goof, as thought, everyone who has ever tried to do TR 0 knows, is all but static.

Hubbard believed that everything not in spacetime must be devoid of motion. If Hubbard were right and life were static, how could it ever communicate with MEST which is all motion?

ZERO

Posted on by
Reply

Zero is not merely a static. What’s static is the boundary. Zero is the static boundary containing a dynamic infinity, all potential that can eventually be de-fined.

To say, like Hubbard does, that life is a static is falsely equating life with the zero boundary condition. In fact life consists of an infinite variety of motion. The motion of thought is basic but is transformed into physical motion through spacetime.

Zero is the ground state of the universe, it is not non-existence which would not have any properties at all, so nothing could be said about it. Zero is the container of infinity and infinity contains all frequencies and if you add them together all the plus and the minus, the real and imaginary numbers you get zero. Σ (x1+x2+…xn )=0 where xn is any and all existents.

DEFINITION OF THETAN, CORRECTED

Posted on by
Reply

A zero dimensional, infinite energy unit, capable of producing subjective spacetime and contributing some of its internal energy to the physical universe, also known as a monad, or singularity.

Earlier this term was defined as a static, denying its internal energy or motion. It was also limited to space production and omitted time. The corrected definition incorporates theta as life energy which is not physical and not produced by the thetan but is an intrinsic part of its mathematical zero/infinity constitution. That life energy can then be transformed into physical energy which is a collective product of all thetans. It also modernizes the definition to include the Einsteinian concept of spacetime.

ARC vs. ABC

Posted on by
Reply

Social psychology is based on the ABCs of affect, behavior, and cognition. In order to effectively maintain and enhance our own lives through successful interaction with others, we rely on these three basic and interrelated human capacities:

ref. https://positivepsychology.com/albert-ellis-abc-model-rebt-cbt/

  1. Affect (feelings)
  2. Behavior (interactions)
  3. Cognition (thought)

In Scientology this reads A, R and C.

  1. Affinity (feelings)
  2. Reality (thought)
  3. Communication (interactions)

COMMUNICATION DOES NOT EQUAL UNDERSTANDING

Posted on by
Reply

A signal, message or auditory communication to arrive at understanding goes through several stages. These are duplication (hearing), discrimination (detecting differentials, such as between the sounds ‘b’ and ‘d’, identification (it’s a ‘b’ or it’s a ‘d’), association (these sounds add up to a word), onto understanding (the correct meaning for the word).
In other words the communication has to be processed correctly in order to result in understanding. That is why ARC is not enough, the raw data need to be analyzed, processed, evaluated in order to reach understanding.

References:

Auditory Processing Disorder | Dr. Angela Loucks Alexander

Compare Axiom 28 original and revised version.

Article: Why arc does not equate to understanding https://xscn.mgtconcepts.com/?p=724

ACTUAL GPMs

Posted on by
3

There is no such thing. The idea of an actual GPM line plot is based on the belief that a goal always leads to its opposition. There ain’t such a thing as ‘earlier goals being dramatized’, there is only one particular goal being pursued in the present time. Earlier goals may exist as memory, but not as actualization. There may be opposition but not necessarily from the same being. There are actual goals and the possible resistance to those from other beings with goals. There are three scenarios: goals supporting other goals, goals countering other goals and goals not affecting other goals.

The subject of goals is in fact the same subject as the ‘dynamic principle of existence’ or the basic motivation of a being. The basic motivation of a being was precisely identified by Nietzsche, it is the Will to Power [refer ethics conditions] and this may be the one goal that all beings have in common, regardless of the individualized versions of this basic goal.

G. FILBERT’S IDEOSYNCRACY

Posted on by
Reply

I think Filbert was the first scientologist to double the number of dynamics up to 16 dynamics way beyond the eighth dynamic of infinity. These so called upper dynamics are simply variations or parts of the seventh or spiritual dynamic. As LRH said anything spiritual with or without identity would come under the heading of the seventh dynamic. The highest dynamic in Scientology is a boundary called infinity which nothing can surpass. Higher dynamics are mentioned en passant and jocularly as in the ninth dynamic: the buck; these were never part of the Scientology system of dynamics.

Thus what Filbert calls dynamics 9 -16 – aestetics, ethics, decency, truth, awareness, individuality, coexistence and theta that is not being – all belong to the seventh dynamic.

His idea was that the upper dynamics rule and produce the junior dynamics. ‘Theta that is not being’ as the highest dynamic would imply that the universe has arisen out of non-existence, now renamed theta, which is impossible.

THE Q REVISITED

Posted on by
Reply

“Survival is our past Q. we were operating from “life is survival”: goal of life is to survive. to survive employs space and time. and that word survival, by the way, evaluates this life, it evaluates most things. but it doesn’t evaluate everything. the thing it doesn’t evolve is all universes, because you don’t have to base a universe on the tenet survival. you can have an instantaneous universe which has no time in it. hence the word survival was betrayed.

“Now, what is this other Q? we’ve had two or three, by the way: there was this survival and then there was the higher level of self-determinism as beingness. and now we have the Q of self-determinism defined.

“Q simply means the most common datum that sums all other data and the point from which we are operating. It does not say there is no higher point. It does not say that point does not exist.”

LRH, Introduction: The Q List and Beginning of Logics.

The new and higher Q [2022]:

The highest common denominator of all of existence is: existential mathematics, the mathematics of thought underlying all mind and matter.

“There is the mathematical reality of this platonic world which gives reality to these notions, so if you like, mathematical facts like there is no largest prime number is eh.. it’s something independent of ourselves it’s always been true it doesn’t, didn’t somehow become true as soon as someone seems to prove it, it’s always been true…”

In the philosophical discussion about whether mathematics is human invention or whether it is discovered, Nobel Laureate Roger Penrose is on the side of discovery.

Sir Roger Penrose https://youtu.be/ujvS2K06dg4